Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dear Donald,

“Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!” @realDonaldTrump  (3:35 AM – 4 Mar 2017)

Just out: The same Russian Ambassador that met Jeff Sessions visited the Obama White House 22 times, and 4 times last year alone.” @realDonaldTrump  (3:42 AM – 4 Mar 2017)

“Is it legal for a sitting President to be “wire tapping” a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!”  @realDonaldTrump  (3:49 AM – 4 Mar 2017)

“I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!”  @realDonaldTrump  (3:52 AM – 4 Mar 2017)

“How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!” @realDonaldTrump (4:02 AM – 4 Mar 2017)

Your accusations are getting way out of hand. I can’t believe you have stooped so low to try and claim your phone lines were being tapped by President Obama. At a certain point, you are going to run out of smoke shields to distract the public with. I honestly feel that all you are trying to do is distract and redirect attention as much as possible to throw blame and try and take the focus away from the real matters at hand.

I mean seriously, let’s say we throw all reason aside and go out on a crazy limb here and take you at your word. Let’s say for whatever insane reason, I believe what you believe is true and President Obama did have your phones tapped. It all seems rather pointless, because nothing came of it. No information seems to have been gleaned to change the results of the election.

Also whether or not the same Russian ambassador was at the White House or not, 1,000 times or zero is not the problem. The problem is if there was meetings occurring with the ambassadors and Sessions couldn’t be forthright with the fact that they even met, it implies that there is something to hide. What was discussed during those meetings. Did Sessions act in any capacity that he did not have authority to act in. Did he make offers or deals that he did not have the authority to make. This is a comparison of apples to oranges.

So tell me what the absolute freaking frick was the freaking point. What facts are these claims even based on. Are you just reacting to whatever you read or hear?? Do you even look into anything, or do you just gobble up any piece of story that comes your way that makes you feel good about yourself? What is your point for even making these absurd claims??

You want to talk about how the people deserves the truth and honesty from the news media. Well you are playing a role in all of by contributing to this media through your social secretions and I think that you should try leading by example.

Sincerely,
A Solicitous Citizen

Advertisements